Verification of tracks made of Cosme using GEFS mean fields
I made eight tracks of Tropical Storm Cosme. Additionally, within 384 hours of cyclogenesis, there were 15 instances, when I missed cyclogenesis entirely. All the tracks were made relatively close to cyclogenesis. In those tracks, longevity and intensity were overestimated. As actual cyclogenesis got very close, the precursor disturbance of Cosme had two competing spins, and my technique produced tracks from the wrong one, resulting in relatively huge position errors at shortest lead times. As of this analysis, best track positions are available July 3, 06Z thru July 8, 12Z, and as such, position comparisons are possible only for this timespan. Getting out of the frame of East Pacific tracking map is considered equal to dissipation for the purpose of this verification. Since I give only SSHS categories in my tracks, I don't calculate intensity errors in units of speed, but in categories. For this purpose, I define tropical or subtropical storms as "Category 0"...