Verification of a track made of Octave using GEFS mean fields

This was originally posted on November 17, 2019. This was corrected on January 10, 2020, as I found, that I had actually done one track of Octave. Previously I thought, that I had done none.

I made one track of Tropical Storm Octave. Within 384 hours of cyclogenesis, there were ten instances, where I missed cyclogenesis.

As of this analysis, best track positions are available October 16, 12Z thru October 19, 18Z, and as such, position comparisons are possible only for this timespan.

Since I give only SSHS categories in my tracks, I don't calculate intensity errors in units of speed, but in categories. For this purpose, I define tropical or subtropical storms as "Category 0", tropical or subtropical depressions as "Category -1" and non-existence of a tropical or subtropical cyclone as "Category -2".

In the track, range, average and median of formation time was October 17, 18Z.

In the eleven cases (1 track and 10 complete misses), peak intensity ranged between Category -2 and Category 2. Average was Category -1.64 and median was Category -2.

In the track, range, average and median of dissipation time was October 31, 00Z.


At the lead time of 1 day (24 hours), there were 0 hits, 0 false detections and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 2 days (48 hours), there were 0 hits, 0 false detections and 2 misses. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 3 days (72 hours), there were 1 hit, 0 false detections and 1 miss. 1 available position comparison produces an average error of 72 nautical miles.

At the lead time of 4 days (96 hours), there were 1 hit, 0 false detections and 1 miss. 1 available position comparison produces an average error of 141 nautical miles.

At the lead time of 5 days (120 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 2 misses. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 6 days (144 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 7 days (168 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 8 days (192 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 9 days (216 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 10 days (240 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 11 days (264 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 12 days (288 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 13 days (312 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 14 days (336 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 15 days (360 hours), there were 0 hits, 1 false detection and 1 miss. No available position comparisons.

At the lead time of 16 days (384 hours), there were 0 hits, 0 false detections and 2 misses. No available position comparisons.

Circle coloration scheme


Here is the track once again.

October 15, 12Z run:


The GEFS runs with complete misses were:

October 2, 06Z
October 3, 06Z
October 5, 06Z
October 7, 06Z
October 9, 06Z

October 11, 06Z
October 13, 06Z
October 14, 12Z
October 16, 06Z
October 17, 06Z

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advisory list

Verification of tracks made of Jimena

2024 hurricane season predictions